Unthinkable Solutions of Fermi's Paradox

"At some point, the gluons will no longer be able to hold the quarks together, and the hadrons will decay. Which will mean the end of matter in this universe." - Albert Einstein ¹

As it seems, in our universe, nothing is made to last. Eventually, everything gets old and dies or changes or decays into something else, and I am not referring to the life forms only but to all matter in the cosmos. For all we know, this might not be true within our own macroworld alone, but also deep below, the same goes for particles in the quantum realm as well. The fact is that everything in the universe has a tendency to achieve the lowest energy state and to finally rest within a stable system, even if that means going through various changes or decays. In the quantum world, this could be true for the Higgs field as well. According to Hawking, if it becomes metastable, the vacuum decay bubble will emerge and consume everything in order to eventually reach the lowest energy state possible. For Higgs field being everywhere in the universe, this would mean instantaneous collapse of the whole universe and it's own ultimate change into a new and ultimately alien environment with a completely new set of laws of physics in the aftermath that could not be as friendly to the living beings as they are today.

But relax, this is just a theory; it might be wrong; nothing like it happened in previous 13.8 billion years (or did it?) and the quote from the beginning is not really formulated by the famous physicist. Well, fictitious Einstein did say it in Phillip P. Peterson's 'Paradox', a remarkable piece of science fiction driven by this scientific premise, but still, it might be something he would say if he were still alive today.

'Paradox' is a relatively new novel series, so I am not going to spoil the content, but to really understand how vacuum decay relates to the well-known Fermi's paradox or to better understand aliens' actions towards Earth and other star systems throughout the universe, I'd warmly recommend the read. As a science fiction fan for years and decades, I could only say that I didn't stumble to the better science fiction in relation to concepts such as Dyson spheres, quantum mechanics, fusion engines, antimatter propulsion, warp drives, the creation of the Big Bang and inflationary space, virtual reality of enormous proportions, wormholes, travel, and communication... The list is going on, and I can only speculate what is inside the third book that has just been released (unfortunately, due to my illiteracy in German, I'll have to wait for the summer and its scheduled translation in English). Anyway, this was one of the rare book series with a sequel even more interesting than the first book, with perfectly connected endings in both of them.

The idea of vacuum decay behind Peterson novels for the solution of Fermi's paradox is indeed new in scientific background, but surely there is more logic we can think of and apply to the absence of aliens, and the idea, more than half a century old, is getting renewed attention in recent years. What I am referring to is the simulation theory and/or holographic principle. It is triggered by the very research of black holes and the information paradox, which states that physical information can be lost and swallowed by black holes despite quantum mechanics postulate that nothing, including information, can ever be lost, only transferred from one form to another. One of the solutions for the paradox I discussed a while ago with the question in the post title 'Are We Holograms?' answered Fermi's paradox perfectly.

However, to get back to science fiction, on several occasions in the past, I mentioned "The Thirteenth Floor", the movie that portrays so far the best story about a simulation of everything in existence. I don't know why, but I never read the backstory about this great film, and especially for this post, I went to check where the script came from in the first place and discovered that it was loosely based on the book called "Simulacron-3", written by Daniel F. Galouye way back in 1964. Needless to say, I downloaded the copy and liked it very, very much. Considering the year and the fact that it was written at the dawn of digital computers, the details and sophistication of the story were amazing. In relation to Fermi's paradox, if we are indeed living in a simulated world created by aliens themselves and we are all nothing more than just a bunch of artificial intelligence characters in the game, then the absence of other intelligent forms becomes clear. Or we will meet them when they become programmed and inserted in the simulation. Anytime now.

Next in line of the fictitious solution for Fermi's paradox on the first glance is not something that much unthinkable. But if we reason about communications over long distances in space, calling the ET and/or receiving a message from aliens from deep space is not as easy as we might think. By using our current technology, that is. The most obvious is the SETI project, which was founded half a century ago based on only monitoring electromagnetic radiation in search of ET broadcasts. After that, many years of looking for the signal from the above failed to find anything so far.

The most interesting and one of the first works of science fiction in this realm was Carl Sagan's 'Contact', in which aliens managed to receive the Earth's earliest TV broadcast 25 light years away, decoded it, and sent it back into SETI's antennas. Unfortunately, even though this looks much more plausible than vacuum decay or giant simulation, it really is not. Engineering and the science behind it are cruel. To broadcast anything at all in the electromagnetic spectrum, the signal must be focused and powerful enough to reach the destination without dissipation of the signal, to avoid the data being embedded in too much noise on the way, or to experience path loss while spreading out over long distances. Our EM broadcasts from Earth are meant for Earth only (or for the Moon on occasion or two in the past), and they are not powerful enough to reach even the closest stars without serious signal loss. To get weak transmissions like that, aliens around Vega might need solar system-wide antennas to detect UHF broadcasts from us. The same goes for SETI on Earth; it is unlikely we will ever get anything that is not narrow, focused, and aimed directly toward us. Nevertheless, ''Contact' will always stay on my physical and digital shelves for being one of the best science fiction films in the history of the genre.

At least for this post, the last and final obstacle with life forms swarming the vast space throughout the universe(s) is ... life itself and its potential limitations. Organic life based on carbon or something else exotic to us could be fragile and short in general. One small asteroid strikes the planet in the Goldilocks zone, and poof... everything dies and resets. Billions of years of evolution go into oblivion in a cosmic second. Even if major extinction events miraculously avoid the intelligent species, they might be destined to destroy themselves at the end of the path. Even more unthinkable scenarios we are still not aware of yet can pop into the equation. One of the obstacles could be that life could exist only in networked scenarios, or, to be precise, it could only work and evolve, more or less, in the form of a giant hive mind in relation to the mother planet. If that's true, there could be a limit in distance for a small number of individuals to leave their world, where they would ultimately lose connection to the hive and die. We never sent anyone or anything to live beyond moon orbit, so if this is true, the border of life could be anywhere beyond that.

I am not sure that Arthur C. Clarke had this in mind when he wrote 'Rendezvous with Rama' back then in 1973. Probably not. However, it was not far from common sense that in this unthinkable scenario, in order to sail toward the stars, the only way that could be done is to build enormous spaceships and giant cities that could carry everybody on the one-way journey. There are countless hazards for that kind of travel, and something along the way might happen to the people who originally populated Rama in the beginning. If we add to the story ultimate laws of physics and issues with limited speed of travel, vast distances between stars, and sparse sources when it comes to little things like food and fuel, 'the hive mind' problem could be another perfect solution to the paradox to consider.

But let's stop here with imagining all potential reasons why we still haven't met ET. If I would like only to spice it up with more unthinkable reasons, it would not be that hard. Just think about the "Zoo Hypothesis", in which we are created and observed by aliens in their science fair experiment, or the theory that we are the first intelligent civilization to emerge so far, or that there is 'The Great Filter' that limits intelligent life species from reaching the potential to dive into stars.

In the end, we could all be wrong. Evolution of species throughout the universe might not be headed toward stars at all. Perhaps we have to reset our minds and look elsewhere, no matter how strange it sounds.

¹ Quote by Albert Einstein character from Phillip P. Peterson's Paradox novel series

Novels:
http://raumvektor.de/paradox/
https://www.amazon.com/Contact-Carl-Sagan-ebook/
https://www.amazon.com/Rendezvous-Rama-Arthur-C-Clarke

Image refs:
https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/heres-how-universe-could-destroy-itself-horror-vacuum-decay
http://lcart3.narod.ru/image/fantasy/jim_burns/jim_burns_cylindrical_sea.jpg
http://starkovtattoo.spb.ru/titanfall-wallpapers

Refs:
http://www.bidstrup.com/seti.htm
https://briankoberlein.com/2015/02/19/e-t-phone-home/
https://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000984.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_F._Galouye
https://medium.com/o-s/6-mind-bending-solutions-to-the-fermi-paradox

Gravis Gravity by Gravitons

Don't take this title too seriously. It's wrong on multiple levels. Grammatically and scientifically. Nonetheless, it fits perfectly for this post. As for grammar amiss, I used the Latin root word 'Gravis', which means heavy, and it is actually the perfect adjective for gravity as we perceive it here on Earth. As for the scientific issue, the rest of the title might be all wrong. If we glimpse into the features of the three main natural forces of the universe, it is obvious that they work in more or less the same fashion—they use carriers or elementary particles to mediate the force through the force field. The photon is one of them, and it carries electromagnetism, while strong and weak forces in the nucleus, respectively, are mediated by gluons and W/Z bosons, and they are all confirmed in experiments. Gravitons are supposed to be the same thing as gravitational force, but they are never found and confirmed either directly or consequently. Ever since Einstein, we have had second thoughts about whether or not gravity is acting as a 'normal' force at all or if it is something entirely different.

Think about this: you are located in the spacecraft far in space outside of the big, heavy planets and stars and truly experience microgravity. You start the engine, and your fancy spaceboat starts accelerating with about 10 m/s, and each second increases the speed with 10 m/s more. Actually, the right number is 9.806 m/s per second, which is the measurable 1 g force of the planet Earth. In our thought experiment, a spacecraft that works in a fashion that always uses constant acceleration and half the journey from, i.e., Earth to Mars, pushes with 1g, and the other half turns around and uses backthrust with the same 1 g, could not only provide a normal human environment inside the craft, but it would also be very fast and reach the red planet in just three days*. If you can't imagine how this would be working in real space travel, I will only state the name of one fictional spaceship from the sci-fi literature. Its name is Rocinante**, and it is one great piece of interplanetary Corvette from the amazing franchise "The Expanse".

Well, science fiction aside, the point here is that gravity and acceleration seem to be one thing. The obvious conclusion in this chain of thoughts is that Earth and Rocinante are both capable of creating gravity of one steady g. At least it looks the same from the observer's point of view. However, we know for sure that Earth is round and rotates, and no matter where you are standing, it will pull you toward its center without accelerating anything. It's just enormously big and does something to the very fabric of spacetime itself, which is actually pulling you by invoking some mechanism we don't understand yet. Perhaps by using gravitons—our friendly force carriers from the title? Actually, both particle and string theories predict gravitons as real things. In the former case, it is a massless boson with spin-2, while in one of the string theories, it is sort of a closed string with a low-energy vibrational state. I will not go into further scientific details in both theories, but it is evident that a massless particle or low-energy string is very hard to observe, as it either never or extremely rarely interacts with other particles on subatomic levels. Let's compare it with neutrinos for a moment—an elementary particle with no charge and the tiniest mass we can detect. Their large, super-awesome underground detectors, like the Super-Kamiokande Neutrino Detector in Japan, detect only a handful of neutrino interactions with regular matter over a long period of time. For example, when light from the Big Kaboom from supernova SN1987A reached the Earth, Kamiokande detected the sum of only 19 neutrinos from this super explosion. And to use Carl Sagan terminology, there were billions and billions of neutrinos only from that event. Detection of a single graviton, even if we consider some theories that suggest gravitons with non-zero mass, would be extremely hard.

Ever since Einstein's general theory of relativity, scientists have been struggling to find the best description for gravity. If we are looking at it as a fourth natural fundamental force, compared to the other three, it is the weakest by far; for example, gravity is about 36 orders of magnitude weaker than electromagnetic force, and it probably has a trivial influence on subatomic particles. However, it is cumulative and always attractive and therefore plays the major role in the macroscopic realm, making it possible for planets to orbit their stars, and it is behind the recently experimentally confirmed gravitational waves by the LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) experiment. Einstein himself first noticed the difference in behavior of four fundamental forces and spoke of gravity as not a 'normal' force per se but more as a fictitious (or apparent) force that is observed only as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of large masses or energy throughout the universe. A very nice example of one apparent force is the Coriolis force, or Coriolis effect. It is observed as a force, but in reality it is just an apparent deflection of an object that is moving in the spherical system, such as Earth, that rotates. Deflection is caused by the fact that the rotating speed of the Earth is faster for a moving object located near the Equator than for one near the pole. In simple words, the system you are moving in is also in its own motion that must be included when you want to calculate the actual path of yours; otherwise, you will never reach your intended target. And in the universe, everything is in motion. Gravity could be just that—an apparent force that is caused by the interaction of large moving masses with the fabric of the universe itself that might be in its own motion as well. Or perhaps gravity could be the outcome of the interactions of mass with the potential energy of that fabric itself. In science fiction and also in the quantum science realm, this is known as zero-point energy, quantum vacuum zero-point energy, or simply vacuum energy. If I understand this correctly, by applying Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (we can only know the position or velocity of a moving particle, but never both), every quantum system to sustain this principle must have minimum non-zero energy. In the case of a vacuum, this is the minimum energy of all fields in the universe, including the necessary Higgs field needed to provide the existence of every mass everywhere in the cosmos in the first place.

In the conclusion of the scientific part of this post, I am hoping that whether the future will confirm gravitons and 'pronounce' gravity as a real fundamental force or we finally find how big masses influence the tiny quantum world of the universe's fundamental ingredients, in the end we will have our answers, which might bring more challenges and questions for future generations. Maybe even ways of mastering it by applying some ingeniously clever engineering of future gravity-related devices and tools. Of course, how exactly the world would be changed with full understanding of gravity and gravity-based appliances; perhaps the best vision is in the science fiction of the amazing futuristic thriller "Influx", written by Daniel Suarez.

I am always eagerly acquiring novels with gravity premises in the background if the plot teaser is interesting enough, so I bought 'Influx' a while ago and stored it in my Kindle's queue for future reading. I was a little busy with my work and reading a couple of other novels, but now I have this regret of why I didn't read it sooner. It was really amazing! Just exactly as comprehensive and entertaining as I was hoping for when I saw the book cover in the first place. The science behind the gravity mirror or deflector invention in the book is perfect and just in the realm of sci-fi plausibility I am always looking for. It was explained perfectly well in both the science behind the invention and also in the workflow of all engineering vehicles, armor, satellites, and other appliances that were built on it. If you add to the main 'gravity' twist all 'regular' sci-fi inventions such as AIs, robots, cold fusion, quantum computers, futuristic weapons, immortality, and other non-sci-fi thriller stuff, please believe me that my additional regret after reading this book was that it had only 500+ pages. I wouldn't mind if Daniel added more stories to it and created a sequel. I read somewhere that FOX is interested in the movie, and hopefully this will see the daylight in the end. It perfectly fits for a motion picture, not just because of the science and story but also because of the potential artistic and visual aspect of gravitational falls in all directions that was extraordinary.

Image refs:
https://www.artstation.com/artist/deningart
http://www.thethoughtarchitects.com/2014/04/14/detecting-neutrinos-neil-degrasse-tyson/
http://www.thedaemon.com/

In-text refs:
* http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2012/08/30/flying-to-mars-in-three-days/
** http://expanse.wikia.com/wiki/Rocinante

Refs:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/01/08/national/science-health/japans-super-k
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2mec3vgeaI

Time Travel

It's a well-known fact that our universe is, as far as we know today, a four-dimensional space-time continuum with three spatial coordinates and time playing the role of the fourth one. We are perfectly capable of traveling backwards and forwards within the first three spatial coordinates, but is it possible to do the same on the fourth one? I am sure you would agree that it is not too exciting going up or down or left or right, but traveling through time could be something special. But is it possible? Let's explore all the theories, share some stories, and read about one connected hoax.

Well yes, like many of you, I also love reading sci-fi stories and watching great movies about time travel, but before I start upgrading my DeLorean with a brand new flux capacitor kit I can find online, let me tell you a story that inspired me to start reading articles and buying popular scientific books regarding the famous fourth dimension of our universe. It happened about 12 years ago when I was telecommuting with a Munich-based company developing software for interactive conferences for pharmaceutical companies. We did a great job, and I was asked to visit Munich for some software tuning and also for some socializing with my partners during the famous Oktoberfest festival. This is kind of a "conference" where instead of software driving the event, the only tool needed is, you guessed it, a great Bavarian beer. So, one night we went there and had a great time. I remember my visit didn't hit the main Oktoberfest night, but still the feeling was all the same. We were sitting in the big hall filled with lots of wooden tables, and I estimated up to 500 people in there. In one brief moment of insanity, I spotted a man enjoining his friends about 50, maybe 70 meters away from us. They were doing the same as us, drinking beer and having a good time, but what impressed me the most was his appearance, which hammered my head for a couple of moments or more. He looked amazingly like the gray aliens portrayed in the Fox Mulder X-Files that aired at the time. He had a large head compared to his body, large slightly curved black eyes, a small nose and mouth, and not much of ears on the top of his head. Probably because of the large amount of beer, I didn't remember clearly what happened after, but I was probably in the center of loud laughter when I pointed my finger and said, "Look, there's an alien drinking beer!" I am sure the amount of beer I drank was responsible for the whole thing, but still, ever since then, I can't stop thinking that gray aliens are nothing more than just our future descendants traveling through time, visiting the past and enjoying good shows, like in this case the best quality of Bavarian beer, especially brewed for Oktoberfest.

Let's face it, we surely don't know how humans will evolve within the next millennium or more, but I am confident that one particular outcome could be just like grays! It's not far from reason that our body would evolve down while our head will be 'heading' in the opposite direction in the future, directly caused by fewer physical activities and more brain evolution toward rationality. Anyway, if I am a future human in possession of a DeLorean with a working flux capacitor from "Back to the Future", after visiting a couple of main historical events, I would definitely visit some great entertainments of the past.

Ok, ok, I know how ridiculous this sounds, so I will stop now and try to get back to the main topic. Let's try to summarize what we scientifically know about time and how to bend it. Through Einstein's theories, we now definitely know that the universe is built from the fabric that is bendable. It was first proven by a famous experiment during a solar eclipse, which showed the curvature of light from a star as the light rays passed by the sun. Arthur Eddington led an expedition to West Africa back in 1919 in order to take pictures of a solar eclipse with definite proof of dislocated stars located next to the sun's disc, caused by a curved universe caused by the sun's large mass. In other words, we definitively know that spacetime is bendable, but the physics of how and why it bends is a completely different story. According to Einstein, in lack of better knowledge of the universe's fabric itself and lack of discovery that would prove the existence of gravitons, we can't say for sure even that gravity is a force at all! It could be just a property of the space-time fabric that bends easily by mass. In other words, the universe could be just a large system of perforated roads for traveling particles with mass and energy waves. Maybe to describe it better with a metaphor, if we are a large mass traveling throughout space and we don't have enough speed and encounter a curved space around a giant star, we are doomed and will be simply captured into circular motion around the large star. The question is, of course, is it possible to curve the space that much so we can travel the curved path back or forth in time? Thanks to Einstein, we now have a great understanding of the physics of the big. There are mathematical equations that describe and predict all known and still not observed objects in our universe. We are also aware of boundaries like the ultimate speed of light for any particle with a mass, and even the physics of the wormholes and warp drives are mathematically plausible. The only problem is that we are too small to comprehend the great amount of (negative) energy required to establish a wormhole or a drive capable of curving the space instead of propelling itself. In many theoretical studies of wormholes, it is still unknown whether or not it is possible to create a stable tunnel through the fabric.

It seems that building large shortcuts in the universe is still out of our reach, probably because of the great energy needed and our lack of understanding of the space fabric itself. The solution is probably waiting to be discovered within a quantum level of existence. Compared to enormous space and large objects, ironically speaking, studying the science of small particles and energy waves is difficult because we are too big! Simply put, we are unable to monitor and understand small objects because our monitoring tools are too large in size. For example, if we are using an electron microscope, we would only be able to monitor objects much larger than the electrons we are beaming into; otherwise, we would be adding additional disturbance to objects we want to see. Studying the quantum world is only possible indirectly, like in giant accelerators where we are beaming two small particles and forcing them to collide and then learning from the snapshots taken from the clash. However, quantum mechanics is a scientific discipline we have been researching for a century or so, and while there are many things waiting to be understood, we have already learned a great deal about particle physics, electromagnetic waves, and the quantum microworld.

So, what do we quantumly know in regard to time travel? This is the story of searching for the ultimate theory that could be able to connect the microworld with the fabric of the universe itself and explain both the physics of micro- and macro-objects and their relations. We are still out of luck, but a couple of leading theories arrived in the previous century in the form of string theory and its variations. What is common for all of them is that they compete with old particle physics either to replace it or to be built on it similarly to what the theory of relativity did for Newton's gravity theory. String theory in the form of a membrane, or M-theory, suggests multiple dimensions and also the creation of multiple universes caused by collisions of membranes. The microworld in this theory would be capable of living and traveling through multiple dimensions and perhaps even universes. Now, how is this connected to time travel? It is important because of our efforts to find a solution to a so-called time travel paradox where traveling backwards in time would be potentially dangerous because of the butterfly effect, where a time traveler, by changing something even as small as killing a butterfly, would end up in a fatal disturbance of the future already happening events. So the additional question arises: if time travel backwards in time is possible by bending space, how has nature solved this paradox? Two solutions are proposed, wherein in one the universe is blocking inconsistent events by its nature, so it is simply impossible for you to go in the past and kidnap Hitler or kill somebody's ancestors in order to change history. If a future version of you visits a younger you, then it is simply impossible to prevent you later in the future from not making the visit in the first place, as this already happened, and it is nothing but a closed, inconsistent loop that is very hard to imagine. Too complicated? Maybe, but then check the other solution where time travel actually places you in a different timeline or parallel universe with copies of you and others. The quantum world recognizes a so-called quantum entanglement where two particles share the same properties even when located in two different locations in space, maybe in time, and perhaps even separated by two dimensions or branes. Does it look like 'fringe' science to you?

Either way, traveling back in time seems to be impossible, blocked, or extremely hard. If you ask Stephen Hawking, the only proof we need is a lack of tourists from the future visiting us. Of course, if you exclude my encounter with the Oktoberfest and gray alien from the beginning of this story.

Like you probably noticed, this post is more about traveling backwards in time, but it would be unfair not to mention the ease of traveling forward in time. We are doing it on a daily basis, and since you started reading this post, you have traveled forward in time for a couple of minutes by now. However, jumping forward into some future destination in time is a different story, but thanks to the theory of relativity, during fast flight of, say, 95% of the speed of light, traveling into the future is more than possible. So to speak. In theory, that is. Namely, it is a well-known thought experiment where a train is circling the Earth at near to light speed for a period of 100 years. Time in the train could be slowed down by a ratio of 1/5000, and their passengers would be older by only one week compared to their fellow Earthlings, who got older by one full century or so.

Like I said, easy. :-)

Time travel is not only popular in scientific circles or sci-fi stories. It is also popular among internet hoaxes. Back then, during 2000 and 2001, a guy named John Titor ruffled the internet audience of the time within bulletin boards and forums, claiming that he came from the year 2036 of his own universe into ours as a guinea pig of the government time travel experiment in his own future time. He was sent to retrieve some old computers they lost in their timeline. He even posted various images and schematics of his time machine based on contained micro singularities installed in the car capable of bending the laser beam toy and therefore the space-time itself. It was enjoyable how detailed it was, along with predictions of future nuclear wars, the CERN LHC experiment, the war in Iraq, etc. Don't miss this story in the below links. I am looking forward to the movie.

* Image credit
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1092026/

Refs:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../STEPHEN-HAWKING-How-build-time-machine.html
http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/parallel-universe.htm
http://www.npr.org/2011/01/24/132932268/a-physicist-explains-why-parallel
http://www.quantumjumping.com/articles/parallel-universe/parallel-universes-theory/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1269288/STEPHEN-HAWKING
http://library.thinkquest.org/27930/wormhole.htm
http://www.h2g2.com/approved_entry/A6345407
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Titor